Raising Money; Paying Finder’s Fees to Unregistered Broker-Dealers Can Be Risky

Business Insights

Raising Money; Paying Finder’s Fees to Unregistered Broker-Dealers Can Be Risky

Jul 11, 2024 | Business Insights

We’re occasionally asked if it’s a good idea for issuers to pay unregistered “finders” fees in exchange for connecting potential investors in conjunction with private securities offerings. “No,” is the short answer.

The majority of finders are hired by issuers under finder’s, advisory, or other agreements that often involve payment of “success fees” when a finance transaction is completed. Payment of transaction-based compensation is treated by US securities regulators as a nearly-conclusive indication that a person is engaged in the securities business and should be registered as a broker-dealer, despite the fact that these arrangements are sometimes structured to try to hide or disguise the true intent of the arrangement.

The Applicable Laws

The following are the key federal broker-dealer statutes that an issuer (or company) using an unregistered finder should be aware of:

  • Section 15(a)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) prohibits anyone from “effecting a transaction in securities” or “attempt to induce the purchase or sale of any security” unless they are registered as a broker or dealer under the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.’s rules and regulations (FINRA). The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has selected FINRA as the regulating entity to license and regulate broker-dealers.
  • Section 29(b) of the Exchange Act. Every contract executed in violation of any part of the broker-dealer registration requirements “must be void” as to the rights of persons who created or engaged in the performance of such contract. As a result, the underlying securities acquisition becomes a voidable transaction, allowing the investor a right of rescission and effectively awarding the investor or purchaser a put right.
  • Section 20(e) of the Exchange Act, which allows the SEC to hold anybody who knowingly or carelessly offers substantial assistance in a violation of the Exchange Act liable for aiding and abetting.

Broker-dealer registration is intended to act as a gatekeeper to protect investors in the marketplace. In the course of their business, FINRA members must “observe high standards of commercial honor and just and equitable principles of trade,” which includes deciding if an investment is “appropriate” for their customers. Finders who assist in transactions rarely make such decisions and instead see themselves as intermediaries who make introductions to possible investors.

Because unregistered broker-dealers may not comply to these high business criteria, the SEC interprets broker-dealer rules broadly while interpreting the few exceptions narrowly. Subject to a few limited exceptions, all intermediates performing securities transactions must be licensed, according to SEC guidance developed from no-action letters. Receiving transaction-based compensation, recommending a company or the purchase of its securities, negotiating terms of a securities offering or purchase, attending meetings or presentations where the investment merits are discussed, performing or accommodating due diligence efforts, providing valuations or estimates of value, and other activities that facilitate a securities transaction are all examples of how to effect a securities transaction.

The Risks

Engaging an unauthorized finder can have a number of negative consequences:

  1. Finder’s Risks: Any unlicensed person participating in activities aimed to affect a securities transaction may be breaking broker-dealer laws. The SEC or state securities regulators may seek an injunction, as well as monetary penalties or criminal consequences, to stop the illegal activity.
  2. Issuer’s Risks: Keeping and allowing an unlicensed intermediary to affect a securities transaction could be a violation of federal and state laws, exposing the issuer to civil and criminal fines. Aiding-and-abetting liability may apply to anyone who intentionally or recklessly gives substantial assistance in a violation of the Exchange Act.
  3. Rescission: Under federal and/or state securities law, a violation of broker-dealer laws gives rise to a right of rescission. The issuer may be required by the SEC or state securities regulators to provide investors with rescission rights, and the issuer may be required to repay the investment.
  4. State Securities Laws: Many states have begun investigating state Form D notice filings (which identify transactions exempt from registration under Regulation D) and carefully monitoring finder’s fees paid in connection with securities transactions. Select jurisdictions have compelled issuers to submit extra information about unregistered broker-dealers, as well as to certify that finder’s fees or commissions were only paid in accordance with broker-dealer legislation in some situations.
  5. Consequences of Bad Actors: An issuer or finder who has been convicted of a felony or misdemeanor, is subject to any court order, judgment, or decree, or is subject to any order of certain regulators may be ineligible to participate in certain types of securities offerings, such as Rule 506 Regulation D offerings and Regulation A offerings.

Broker-dealer laws can be broken if you use an unauthorized finder. When finder’s fees or commissions are paid in conjunction with an offering, the problem frequently arises in the context of state notice filings and direct questions from state securities regulators. They may also develop as a result of a failed investment; in which case the investor may pursue claims for broker-dealer law violations in order to establish a right of rescission. When deciding whether to hire a finder to assist with financing transactions, issuers should proceed with caution.

What Can You Do?

  1. Use only registered Broker-Dealers.
  2. Avoid any intermediary who tells you not to worry about this; you and your company have much more at risk than the intermediary.
  3. Structure intermediate compensation arrangements with unregistered intermediaries to avoid “success” fees; all compensation should be independent of outcome.
  4. Be extremely wary of any intermediaries that refer you to affiliated investors without disclosure of any conflicts.
  5. Research and participate in reputable investing networks and organizations. Ask around.
  6. Contact potential investors directly.

For further insights and legal advice on how finder’s fees and broker-dealer laws, please contact Justin Banford, at jbanford@beankinney.com or (703) 284.7253.

This article is for informational purposes only and does not contain or convey legal advice. Consult a lawyer. Any views or opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and are not necessarily the views of any client.

LinkedIn

Follow us on LinkedIn to view the latest blogs from our team.

About – Business Insights

Our business blog focuses on issues affecting Virginia, D.C. and Maryland business owners as well as those in other jurisdictions throughout the country. We provide timely insight and commentary on federal and state rules and how they affect you. If you are interested in having us cover a specific topic, please let us know.

About – Employment Law

As employment law constantly changes, the attorneys at Bean, Kinney & Korman stay up to date on the law as it develops. Our blog topics focus on those changes and what you need to know about them, ranging from severance agreements and the FLSA to social media in the workplace and recent court decisions. If you are interested in having us cover a specific topic, please let us know.

About- Real Estate

This blog focuses on real estate, land use and construction-related topics affecting Virginia and the Washington, D.C. metro area. With topics ranging from contract drafting and negotiation to local and regional land use project updates, the attorneys at Bean, Kinney & Korman provide timely insight and commentary on the issues affecting owners, builders, developers, contractors, subcontractors and other players in the industry. If you are interested in having us cover a specific topic, please let us know.

Financial and Tax Implications in a Business Divorce

In the complex landscape of business divorces, understanding the financial and tax implications is crucial. These considerations can significantly impact both the immediate settlement and the long-term financial health of the involved parties. This blog, the fourth in...

Some Things a Non-profit Should Never Do

Lawyers are quite good at putting the fear of God into their clients and friends. This tendency has even been reduced to the catchy term of laying out the “Parade of the Horribles.” In reality, for non-profits, there are some things you absolutely, positively should...

Negotiating the Exit in a Business Divorce

Negotiating an exit in a business divorce can be one of the most critical phases of the entire process. Somewhat like a conventional divorce, business divorces involve complex financial, operational, and personal considerations that can significantly impact the future...