NLRB Ruling in Browning-Ferris Industries Case Is Likely to Have a Significant Impact on Employers who Utilize Contract and Temporary Employees

Employment Law

NLRB Ruling in Browning-Ferris Industries Case Is Likely to Have a Significant Impact on Employers who Utilize Contract and Temporary Employees

Aug 31, 2015 | Employment Law

In a landmark decision on Thursday, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or “Board”), by a 3-2 vote, determined that its long-standing “joint-employment jurisprudence” had grown “increasingly out of step with changing economic circumstances, particularly the recent dramatic growth in contingent employment relationships, i.e., shift work, contract workers, and temporary employee relationships[,]” across the U.S.

The NLRB announced a new joint-employer rule in the case of a group of sanitation workers, writing that “the Board may find that two or more statutory employers are joint employers of the same statutory employees if they ‘share or codetermine those matters governing the essential terms and conditions of employment.’” An employer’s control over the employee need not be exercised “directly and immediately.” Joint employer status may now be established even where the employer’s control is indirect – such as through an intermediary. The Board’s previous approach, which was decades old, had been much narrower: one business could not be held responsible for employee-related conditions at another employer, unless the employer actually had direct control over the employees at issue.

The impact of the NLRB’s ruling is expected to be felt most acutely in business sectors that rely heavily on contract workers and employees of franchisees, such as the fast food and construction industries, and for temporary staffing agencies, and is expected to facilitate employee collective bargaining activity and make it easier for employees to claim the protections of federal workplace safety and other statutory protections. The Board is expected to apply the new joint-employer standard this fall in cases that are pending against McDonald’s Corp.

LinkedIn

Follow us on LinkedIn to view the latest blogs from our team.

About – Business Insights

Our business blog focuses on issues affecting Virginia, D.C. and Maryland business owners as well as those in other jurisdictions throughout the country. We provide timely insight and commentary on federal and state rules and how they affect you. If you are interested in having us cover a specific topic, please let us know.

About – Employment Law

As employment law constantly changes, the attorneys at Bean, Kinney & Korman stay up to date on the law as it develops. Our blog topics focus on those changes and what you need to know about them, ranging from severance agreements and the FLSA to social media in the workplace and recent court decisions. If you are interested in having us cover a specific topic, please let us know.

About- Real Estate

This blog focuses on real estate, land use and construction-related topics affecting Virginia and the Washington, D.C. metro area. With topics ranging from contract drafting and negotiation to local and regional land use project updates, the attorneys at Bean, Kinney & Korman provide timely insight and commentary on the issues affecting owners, builders, developers, contractors, subcontractors and other players in the industry. If you are interested in having us cover a specific topic, please let us know.

Equal Pay and Your Workplace: What Employers Need to Know

Equal Pay Day was originated in 1996 by the National Committee on Pay Equity to highlight the gap between men’s and women’s wages. The next Equal Pay Day is March 14, 2023. It symbolizes how far into 2023 women must work to earn what men earned in the previous year....

NLRB Changes Rules for Employee Severance Agreements

On February 21, 2023, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) issued a significant decision in McLaren Macomb, ruling that an employer may not offer employee severance agreements containing broad confidentiality and non-disparagement restrictions because such...