Government contracting presents significant opportunities—but also complex regulatory, compliance, and procedural challenges. At Bean, Kinney & Korman, our attorneys help businesses navigate every stage of the government contracting lifecycle, from identifying opportunities and securing contracts to ensuring compliance and resolving disputes.
We represent contractors, subcontractors, and businesses entering the federal, state, and local procurement space. Our team combines deep knowledge of procurement law with practical experience to help clients compete effectively, manage risk, and protect their interests.
What We Do
We provide comprehensive legal support across all aspects of government contracting, including:
- Setting up your government contracting business entity, drafting corporate governance documents, negotiating corporate, LLC and partnership agreements among founders
- Bid preparation, review, and compliance
- Proposal strategy and risk mitigation
- Contract and subcontract negotiation and administration
- Teaming Agreement drafting, review and negotiation
- Subcontracting agreements and disputes
- Regulatory compliance (FAR, DFARS, agency-specific rules)
- Small business and socio-economic program guidance (SDVOSB, WOSB, 8(a), HUBZone)
- CPARS issues (Contractor Performance Assessment Reviews)
- Employment-related guidance, compliance and document drafting
- Internal investigations and compliance reviews
- Suspension and debarment defense
Our goal is to position clients not only to win contracts, but to successfully perform and grow within the federal, state and local government marketplaces
Bid Protests & Contract Disputes
When contract awards are challenged or performance issues arise, timing and strategy are critical.
We represent clients in:
- Bid protests before the Government Accountability Office (GAO)
- Agency-level protests
- U.S. Court of Federal Claims litigation
- Contract disputes under the Contract Disputes Act (CDA)
- Claims involving terminations, delays, and requests for equitable adjustment
We help clients assess whether to protest, defend, or negotiate—and execute quickly to protect their competitive position.
Compliance & Risk Management
Government contractors operate in a highly regulated environment where compliance failures can result in severe penalties.
We assist clients with:
- FAR and DFARS compliance
- Mandatory disclosure obligations
- False Claims Act (FCA) risk mitigation
- Ethics and compliance program development
- Internal investigations and audits
- Responding to government inquiries and subpoenas
Our proactive approach helps clients avoid issues before they arise and respond effectively when they do.
Small Business & Set-Aside Programs
Navigating federal small business programs can be a powerful growth strategy—but requires careful structuring and compliance.
We advise on:
- SBA 8(a) Business Development Program
- Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) certification
- Women-Owned Small Business (WOSB) programs
- HUBZone eligibility and compliance
- Joint ventures and mentor-protégé agreements
We help ensure eligibility, maintain compliance, and structure partnerships that maximize opportunity while minimizing risk.
Subcontracting, Joint Venture & Teaming Agreements
Strategic partnerships are often essential to winning and performing government contracts.
We support clients in:
- Drafting and negotiating non-disclosure agreements
- Drafting and negotiating teaming agreements
- Drafting and negotiating joint venture and mentor protégé agreements
- Drafting and negotiating subcontracts
- Flow-down clause compliance
- Protecting intellectual property and proprietary information
- Resolving disputes between prime contractors and subcontractors
Our focus is on creating clear, enforceable agreements that align incentives and protect your business interests.
Why Bean, Kinney & Korman
Our government contracts team brings a practical, business-focused approach grounded in real-world experience. We understand the pressures contractors face—from tight proposal timelines to evolving regulatory requirements—and provide clear, actionable guidance.
Whether you are entering the government market for the first time or managing a mature portfolio of contracts, we help you navigate complexity, reduce risk, and position your organization for long-term success.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a bid protest, and when should I file one?
A bid protest is a formal challenge to a contract award or solicitation. You should consider filing when there is a clear error in the procurement process that affected the outcome.
What regulations govern federal contracts?
Most federal contracts are governed by the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), along with agency-specific supplements like DFARS.
What happens if my company is investigated for compliance issues?
Early legal guidance is critical. We help manage investigations, respond to inquiries, and mitigate potential penalties.
How can small businesses qualify for set-aside contracts?
Businesses must meet eligibility requirements set by the SBA for programs like 8(a), WOSB, SDVOSB or HUBZone. Proper certification and ongoing compliance are essential.
Representative Matters
In re Applicant for Security Clearance, ISCR Case No. 02-15474 (Dep’t of Defense App. Bd. July 3, 2006)
View document (PDF)In re Applicant for Security Clearance, ISCR Case No. 99-0016 (Dep’t of Defense App. Bd. May 21, 1999)
View document (PDF)In re Green Valley Transp., Inc., B-285283, 2000 Comp. Gen. Proc. Dec. P133 (Comp. Gen. Aug. 9, 2000)
View document (PDF)In re Green Valley Transp., Inc. II, B-285283.2, 2001 Comp. Gen. Proc. Dec. P80 (Comp. Gen. April 16, 2001)
View document (PDF)In re Ready Transportation, Inc., B-285283.3; B-285283.4, 2001 Comp. Gen. Proc. Dec. P90 (Comp. Gen. May 8, 2001)
View document (PDF)Scharpenberg v. Carrington, 686 F. Supp. 2d 655 (E.D. Va. 2010)
View document (PDF)Technology & Mgmt. Servs. v. EPA, No. 96-1386, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 2781 at *1 (4th Cir. Feb. 18, 1997)
View document (PDF)Union Pac. R.R. Co. v. Surface Transp. Bd., 202 F.3d 337 (D.C. Cir. 2000)
Principal drafter of the brief of intervener. The court adopted the arguments in the intervener’s brief and upheld the board’s determination that a railroad’s rates in conjunction with a bottleneck movement were unreasonable.
Blogs
Videos
News & Publications
Recent Highlights
Blog Post
Employment Law Landmines for Federal Contractors
Event
Nonprofit Forum
Video
The BKK Beat, Episode 27: Employment and IP Law in the News
News / Publication
2026 Super Lawyers
Blog Post
What is Worrying Our Nonprofit Clients – Part III: Staffing and Talent
Event
On Board
Video
The BKK Beat, Episode 26: Employment and IP Law in the News
News / Publication
